Invasive Species Control Strategies – Avoiding the Whac-A-Mole Approach

Successfully controlling invasive species may be the most difficult (and important) part of prairie management.  There are few things more frustrating than the realization that, despite your best efforts, there are more (insert your species here) than there were the year before.  Because of the immensity of the challenge, it’s crucial to make your control efforts as efficient and effective as possible.

I sometimes think of invasive species control like the game “Whac-a-mole”.  It often feels like I hit one weed just to see another one pop up somewhere else.  Of course, there are two differences between Whac-a-mole and real invasive species control.  First, Whac-a-mole is a just game, and losing doesn’t mean anything.  Second, if Whac-a-mole was really like invasive species control, the moles would be multiplying and spreading across the county!

Every invasive species is different, and each requires its own specific control technique.  However, there are some broad strategies that can apply to almost every situation, and can increase the effectiveness of your attack.  The most important may be the “work from the edges” approach.  When faced with a major infestation of a particular weed (or any other kind of invasive) it’s often tempting to wade into the biggest thickest part of the infestation and start killing everything you can.  It makes you feel good and you can stand back and see that you’ve done something.  Unfortunately, that’s often the least efficient approach.  To continue the analogy, you’re just hitting the biggest and slowest mole, while letting the others continue to spread. 

Two examples of working from the edge to control invasive species. In example A, the invasive species is radiating outward from older larger populations. In example B, the species is moving in one direction. In both cases, initial control efforts should be targeted at the new small populations first.

Working from the edges of an infestation toward the middle, or toward the source, has a couple of advantages.  First, by focusing on the edges of a spreading infestation, you’re protecting the portions of your prairie that aren’t yet invaded.  Keeping those areas clean has to be the highest priority.  Second, newly-established plants are often the easiest to eliminate.  Young plants are less likely than older plants to have developed an extensive root system or a large seed bank.  Often, if you can successfully kill a new plant it stays dead (the mole doesn’t pop back up). 

Once you have the outlying plants taken care of, you can start working toward the center (or the source) of the infestation.  However, it’s usually more important to spend adequate time making sure every plant you kill stays dead than it is to move quickly to kill everything.  It may be more valuable to spend your time re-checking and re-treating the plants that you worked on last week than attacking new ones.  Even when you move to the next set of plants, be sure to continue checking up on the ones you’ve controlled in the past to make sure they don’t pop back up.  When you feel comfortable that you’ve got the outlying plants eliminated, a quick periodic sweep of those areas can be sufficient, and you can start enjoying the third advantage of working from the edges – now that you’ve got the edges taken care of, you can focus all of your energy on the main part of the infestation without constantly looking over your shoulder.

Crown vetch is an example of an invasive species that can be very difficult to control. Repeated herbicide treatments are usually necessary, especially on well-established populations. Crown vetch tends to grow in large clumps, so working from the edge can mean both starting on the edge of each clump as well as working on the smallest clumps first.

Working from the edges applies to invasive species control at multiple scales.  At the prairie scale, it applies to the control of a species with multiple populations across the prairie – (focus on the newer populations first).  Within a prairie, it can also apply to the attack of a single weed patch (get the edges under control so the patch doesn’t continue to grow).  In both cases, the first objective is to keep the problem from getting worse.  If that’s successful, the next objective is to start shrinking the existing population(s) without letting new ones get started.

In some cases, it can be worthwhile to do a quick-and-dirty attack on the more established portions of an infestation even while you’re working to systematically eliminate the plants at the edges.  For example, you may want to quickly mow through patches of older plants as they’re flowering, preventing them from producing seeds.  While you’re not killing those plants, you’re improving the likelihood that you’ll be able to contain the overall infestation by slowing its rate of spread.  (Just be sure to clean off the mower, your shoes, or anything else that might otherwise spread the seeds anyway!)  A similar strategy can be used when only a subset of the older population is reproducing.  When controlling invasive trees, for example, younger trees (or male trees) may not be producing seeds.  If only a small percentage of the trees are reproducing, taking the time to find and kill those may be worth the effort, even if they’re in the middle of the infestation.  Then you can return to the edges, knowing that your chances of containment have improved.

While it is a native species, eastern red cedar can be an aggressive plant in prairies, especially in the absence of regular fire. Focusing early control efforts on mature female trees that are producing berries can be a good way to help slow the spread of trees while you work to contain the overall infestation.

Here’s a real example from one of our prairies:  We’re fighting Canada thistle in a large floodplain prairie (well over 1,000 acres).  The worst part of the infestation is in a wet and shrubby area where control (and access) is very difficult.  The remainder of the property has widely scattered patches of thistles.  We’re able to spot-spray all of those scattered populations each year, and have been slowly reducing the number and size of those patches.  However, we don’t yet have the resources to hit the scattered patches AND attack the really bad area – especially because the time window for effective control is relatively short each season.  We do what we can to hit the plants near the edges of that main population to help keep it from spreading, but we’re mainly trying to keep the rest of the property from being overrun.  Ideally, we’d be mowing the flowering heads off of the plants in the large population, but we can’t get equipment into that area.  As we continue to eliminate the small scattered populations, we’ll have more time to start working into the large population and begin shrinking it a little each year.  It’s not the best situation, but it’s the real situation, and we’re trying to make the best of it.

In some cases, an effective attack – with consistent follow-up – can eliminate an invasive species from a prairie, and you might just have to conduct an annual patrol to ensure that it’s still gone.  In other cases, containment of the worst area(s) may be the best case scenario, and you may have to plan to conduct perennial search-and-destroy missions to prevent new populations from starting.  In still other cases, an invasive species may be so entrenched across an entire prairie that you just have to try to suppress its vigor and allow as many other species to survive as possible.  And, of course, you’re likely to have all three of these situations happening simultaneously in the same prairie, so it’s important to have clear objectives and strategies for each invasive species you’re dealing with.

Regardless of the invasive species or its level of infestation, an efficient and effective attack strategy is critically important.  Not only will it improve your chances of success, it will also help maintain your sanity – it’s much less frustrating to know that you’re making gradual progress in your control than to attack sporadically, only to see plants or populations pop back up behind you. 

Makes you wonder why Whac-a-mole was such a popular game, doesn’t it?

About these ads

About Chris Helzer

Chris Helzer is an ecologist and Eastern Nebraska Program Director for The Nature Conservancy. He supervises the management and restoration of approximately 4,000 acres of land in central and eastern Nebraska - primarily along the central Platte River. Chris is also the author of "The Ecology and Management of Prairies in the Central United States", published by the University of Iowa Press.
This entry was posted in General, Prairie Management and tagged , , , , , , , . Bookmark the permalink.

12 Responses to Invasive Species Control Strategies – Avoiding the Whac-A-Mole Approach

  1. Mel says:

    Actually, Chris, it reminds me of the old computer game “Life” where survival or death of a population was based on rules about cells adjacent to the cell a “lifeform” occupied. By modifying these rules you could arrive at interesting patterns or wipe out a population. The game was designed to facilitate ecology discussions regarding survival of endangered species but you could turn it around and use it as a model on how to wipe out a species!

    Different from this game, though, is that your lifeforms can move around by spreading seeds or roots. Makes your “rules of adjacent cells” much more challenging. I don’t suppose you’ve found any predator species that find these invasive ones more tasty than the prairie grass, have you?

  2. James C. Trager says:

    I think the working in from the edges and outliers may work best with species with short distance seed dispersal, better than those that are, say, wind or bird-dispersed. What do you think?

    • Chris Helzer says:

      I see what you’re saying, but I still think it usually applies. Part of it is scale dependent, of course. If the source of the invasive plant is 2 miles away from your small prairie, the infestation might be coming in at random locations. If you can catch each new establishing plant as it starts, you’re not really working from the edge because there isn’t an edge there. On the other hand, if the plants get established and start spreading from those points, you might still attack from the edge of each of those populations… If the source of the infestation is on your prairie, even long-distance wind-dispersed seeds tend to fall mainly near the parent plant, with only a small percentage going very far away, so there still would likely be a directionality to the infestation that you could attack from downstream to upstream…

      I do think it might be more important to do something about the seed production (mowing, etc) in the source population(s)- while still working the edges – with long-distance dispersing plants than short-distance plants.

      As always, every species and situation is different, consult your local invasive species consultant before making any big money decisions…

  3. Invasivore says:

    Chris,
    Thanks for the strategy tips. One of the things we like to do is combine control of invasive species with eating them. For example, we’ve talked about Himalayan Balckberries . Are any of the prairie invaders you are concerned with edible? We’d be interested in developing some recipes for them.

    • Chris Helzer says:

      None of the invasives I deal with are edible, as far as I know. I’ve got no objection to people eating invasives as long as it doesn’t become an excuse for not completely eradicating the species, when possible.

      Good luck with your eating!

  4. Pingback: Weekly Invasivore Round-up Feb. 26, 2011 | Invasivore.org

  5. Pingback: Purist or Pragmatist? Identifying and Addressing Non-Native vs. Invasive Species in Prairies. | The Prairie Ecologist

  6. Pingback: Why There Is No Cookbook for Restoring and Managing Prairies | The Prairie Ecologist

  7. Adam Thada says:

    Chris,

    Thanks for leaving these old posts up. I just read this piece – very helpful for thinking about invasives. My context is constructed wetlands in NE Indiana, but many of the same principles apply. It’s helping me think about how to document/describe my control efforts (as a intermittent technician) in a way that helps the property for the long-term. As you know, a lot of us are facing too many acres, too many plants, and not enough staff (or too much turnover). Careful triage is the name of the game.

    -Adam-

  8. Pingback: Categorizing Invasive Plants | The Prairie Ecologist

PLEASE COMMENT ON THIS POST!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s