Photos of the Week – August 20, 2021

Here are some photos from the last several weeks that I haven’t yet shared here – though a couple of them have showed up on my Instagram account, for those of you who follow me there (@prairieecologist). Speaking of shameless plugs, I appeared on a podcast released earlier this week by ‘The Good, The Bad, and The Science’. On the episode, I was paired with comedian Greg Proops (‘Whose Line is it Anyway’) as we and the host discussed/reviewed the Discovery documentary Attack of the Murder Hornets. You don’t have to have seen the documentary to listen to the podcast – we talked about the Asian giant hornet, but also a lot about bees, the relationship between people and nature, and – for some reason – horse racing. I really enjoyed the conversation, and was especially impressed with Greg and his thoughtful perspectives.

Here are some recent photos and some accompanying commentary that probably goes on a little too long.

Illinois tickclover (Desmodium illinoense) and morning dew. Nikon 105mm macro lens. ISO 800, f/9, 1/500 sec.

The Illinois tickclover photo above was taken back in early August. That species has mostly ripened its seeds by now, which means every trip to certain prairies takes some forethought about clothing choices. The little Velcro-like envelopes around the seeds stick to almost everything, but cotton or other clothing with any kind of slight ‘fuzzy’ texture is especially vulnerable. I also have to factor in extra time to scrape/pick seeds off my clothes, either before leaving the site or after getting home. If I miss any and put clothes through the laundry, the seeds either stay attached or end up on other articles of clothing in the same load.

Despite the logistical challenges of hanging around the species, it really is a wonderful plant. It doesn’t often bloom in prairies being actively grazed, so I see it most in small ungrazed prairies like Lincoln Creek Prairie here in Aurora, or along roadsides or in parts of our Platte River Prairies that aren’t currently exposed to cattle grazing. A few years ago, I found a patch of these plants at Lincoln Creek Prairie that seemed to have caught numerous insects on their fuzzy stems. It looked like some kind of a sticky substance was being exuded by the plant (through the hairs?) and the result was lots of dead bugs of multiple kinds that got stuck and died. Each year, I look for that again – both on the same patch of plants and elsewhere – and I have yet to see it. Very curious. Has anyone else seen this?

Chinese praying mantis (Tenodera sinensis) and dew. Nikon 105mm macro lens. ISO 500, f/11, 1/200 sec.

I can’t seem to walk past a praying mantis without trying to photograph it. The one above was no exception. It was hanging upside down and covered in dew during an early morning walk at Lincoln Creek Prairie and the light was just right. How am I supposed to pass that up? You can’t see Lincoln Creek Prairie through its eyes, but you can see a lot of it through the big dew drop on its eyes!

Sideoats grama (Bouteloua curtipendula). Nikon 105mm macro lens. ISO 500, f/14, 1/320 sec.

Sideoats grama is another species that’s hard for me to walk past without stopping. It’s a tricky one to photograph if there’s any kind of breeze, and depth-of-field becomes a real issue if I want to have a clean background but still get most of the flowers in focus. In this case, the long flowering stem had become lodged between a couple neighboring plants, holding it pretty steady and mostly horizontal. I positioned my tripod so all the flowers were the same distance from my lens, and got low enough that everything in the background was far enough away to fade into a smooth blur. I have many many sideoats photos, but I guess I’ll just keep building that library. For some reason.

Plains sunflowers (Helianthus petiolaris) at sunrise. The Nature Conservancy’s Platte River Prairies. Tamron 100-400mm lens @400mm. ISO 500, f/16, 1/250 sec.

The sunrise photo above was taken in the small range of sandy hills at the Platte River Prairies. I was having trouble finding something to put in front of the sun and fell back on my regular crutch of sunflowers. I took several photos that prominently featured a sunflower head with the sun right behind it or next to it, but this more abstract image ended up being my favorite from the day.

Robber fly (Promachus sp). The Nature Conservancy’s Platte River Prairies. Nikon 105mm macro lens. ISO 500, f/14, 1/640 sec.

I see a lot of these big green-eyed robber flies this time of year, but this one was perched on a stiff sunflower and seemed to be laying eggs in it. I’d never considered that robber flies might lay eggs in flowers since their larvae are predators in the soil. This one certainly appeared to be doing that, though, moving in a slow circle and repeatedly curving her abdomen so the tip touched the flower. I looked this behavior up when I got home and found that it’s a thing with a least some robber fly species. They seem to target species in the sunflower family (Asteraceae), but the larvae still drop to the soil after hatching, so I wonder why they put the eggs in flowers instead of into the soil?

When I saw this one from far away and noticed what it seemed to be doing, I wanted to be sure I got a photo without scaring it, so I started by photographing it from a distance with my 400mm lens. After I got a couple decent shots that way, I switched to my macro lens and started creeping closer. As it turned out, I needn’t have worried – it was so intent on its activity that it didn’t pay me any mind. I was moving very slowly and deliberately, but I photographed it up close for several minutes before sliding away and it continued to lay eggs even after I left. That helps make up for all the robber flies that never let me get within 10 feet of them, I guess.

Showy tickclover (Desmodium canadense). The Nature Conservancy’s Platte River Prairies. Nikon 105mm macro lens. ISO 500, f/14, 1/320 sec.

As pretty as Illinois tickclover flowers are, I think showy tickclover, aka showy tick trefoil, is even more gorgeous. I guess whomever came up with the common name of the plant agreed. Not only are the individual blossoms bigger and more colorful, there are also many more of them per plant. Don’t get me wrong, I love both species, but in terms of the aesthetics of the individual flowers, I have to give showy tickclover the nod.

Earlier, I said tickclover flowers are hard to find in actively grazed areas. That’s usually true with showy tickclover too, but this photo was actually taken in a grazed site in our Platte River Prairies. It’s a patch-burn grazed site and tick clover plants in the unburned portion had only been nipped at by the cattle. The plants were shorter than usual, but still had a lot of blossoms. We have a pretty light stocking rate in that particular unit this year, which lets the cattle be very selective about what they eat – and that, in turn, means a lot more wildflowers are ungrazed, including some of their typical favorites.

Stiff sunflower (Helianthus pauciflorus) at The Nature Conservancy’s Platte River Prairies. Nikon 105mm macro lens. ISO 500, f/8, 1/1000 sec.

I’ve led several plant identification workshops over the last month and one of the emphases has been the various sunflowers that grow in our prairies. There are nine native sunflower species in Nebraska – two annuals and 7 perennials. When I talk about how to identify stiff sunflower, one the perennials, I talk about the stiff, sandpapery slender leaves and the low density of leaves toward the top of the plant. But if it’s blooming, I always point out the neat, round and compact shape of the bracts behind the flowers. Other sunflowers have long curving bracts, but stiff sunflower’s bracts are short and curved. It’s a great flower to photograph from behind and I probably have way more photos from that perspective than makes any sense.

Wild bergamot, aka bee balm (Monarda fistulosa). The Nature Conservancy’s Platte River Prairies. Nikon 105mm macro lens. ISO 500, f/14, 1/500 sec.

This post is going to get way too long if I keep writing two paragraphs about each photo. Wild bergamot is a gorgeous flower and really attractive to bees – especially bumblebees – and other long-tongued pollinators like butterflies and moths.

Male long-horned bees that overnighted in stiff sunflower. The Nature Conservancy’s Platte River Prairies. Nikon 105mm macro lens. ISO 500, f/14, 1/640 sec.

Most of the 4,000 or so bee species in North America are solitary (single females build and provision a nest). The numerous males of those solitary bee species don’t have a nest because their only job is to try to intersect females and interrupt their foraging long enough to mate with them. At night, those males just find anyplace they can to sleep. Often, that includes inside a flower, especially if it provides a little compartment that helps hide the bees. The two long-horned bees above spent the night in a partially opened sunflower and were still there the next morning.

Bush katydid. The Nature Conservancy’s Platte River Prairies. Nikon 105mm macro lens. ISO 500, f/14, 1/500 sec.

My favorite thing about katydids is that they hear through their elbows (you can see the opening on its leg at the far left of the above photo). There’s much more to them than that, of course, but it’s a fun fact to share. They also have very long antennae, which helps separate them from grasshoppers, which have short antennae. Both groups of insects, though, have complicated communication strategies that include both visual and auditory clues. They’re far from just plant-eating machines.

Have a great weekend!

Portrait of a Summer Prairie Burn

Last week, we conducted two small prescribed fires at our Platte River Prairies (25 acres and 12 acres). Well, when I say WE, I mean the crew of Nature Conservancy and partner staff, who actually did the work. My job was to just photograph the event for educational purposes, including this blog post, which is intended to explain what summer prescribed fires look like and why they are used.

Fire photographer is definitely my favorite role on a prescribed fire. The stress level is very low compared to my usual role of burn boss. Instead of managing a complex operation consisting of numerous crew members and lots of potential risks, I pointed a camera at those people and pushed a button many times. I also flew a drone around a little. Low stress.

So – why would we burn a prairie in August? Also, do prairies even burn when they’re that green? Both are good questions. The answer to the second is yes, as long as there is enough dry vegetation from previous years’ growth to fuel the fire. The above video shows what one of the prairie burn units looked like about an hour before we lit it on fire. The image below shows a cross section of that prairie’s vegetation – see the layer of dead brown grass at the base of those green plants? That’s what carried the fire.

A layer of thatch (previous years’ growth) at the base of green prairie plants.

The ‘Why?’ question is more complicated. We had a couple objectives for last week’s burns. One objective was to experiment with growing season fires as a way to control woody encroachment by eastern redcedar, dogwood, and other shrubs and trees. We, like many others, are struggling to understand and control the flood of woody plants that can swamp out prairies.

In some places, summer fires apparently do a decent job of setting back re-sprouting deciduous species like dogwood and sumac and killing non-resprouting species like eastern redcedar. My limited experience with summer burns has not given me a lot of confidence that mid-to-late summer fires do much long-term damage to deciduous shrubs in this part of the state, but I need more data points. Plus, I don’t really have a lot of better options to suggest.

One of the two line crews goes over maps, plans, and assignments prior to ignition. The two line crews ignited in opposite directions as the burn was conducted.

A second big objective was to use a combination of summer fire and cattle grazing to diversify both the habitat (vegetation structure) and the plant composition of the two prairies. Last week’s burns should have a pretty strong negative impact on the vigor of warm-season grasses like big bluestem, Indiangrass, and switchgrass, which were just beginning their flowering period. It will also have similar impacts on wildflowers that haven’t yet wrapped up their growth cycle for the year. The temporary suppression of those species will open up some space for other plants who don’t normally compete well with those big plants.

In addition, both prairies we burned have cattle in them, and as the new burned patches (which make up small portions of each site) start to green up, cattle will quickly shift their grazing to that lush green growth and start grazing it hard – especially the grasses. In this case, we expect much of that grass to consist of fall-growing (cool-season) species, including lots of smooth brome and Kentucky bluegrass. Without grazing, summer fires around here tend to shift the balance of power to those invasive grasses, which can then crowd out the wildflowers we’re trying to encourage. Cattle grazing can negate that shift of power by keeping those invasive grasses short, giving wildflowers a break from competing with both warm-season and cool-season grasses, and allowing them to really thrive for a year or two.

Both these prairies are being managed with patch-burn grazing, and both have patches that were burned back in the spring of this year. Cattle have been grazing those burned patches intensively, but should now shift at least some of their attention to these summer burn patches for the rest of this year and until more patches are burned sometime next year (probably early or late spring). The combination of spring-burned/grazed patches, summer-burned/grazed patches, patches recovering from previous burns/grazing, and fully recovered patches creates a broad array of habitat structure for prairie animals – vertebrates and invertebrates. It also creates a wide variety of growing conditions for plants, each of which favors a different subset of the plant community. The result is the kind of shifting mosaic of habitat and biological diversity we’re shooting for.

Lighting the backing fire. The backing fire is the slow moving fire that is allowed to burn into the wind but is prevented from running downwind by a mowed break that has also just been sprayed with water to keep it from burning.

Like most prescribed fires, our summer burn operations began by lighting a backing fire on the downwind edges of the burn unit. A mowed firebreak helped to keep the fire from being able run downwind like it wanted to, and crew members sprayed water on the mowed grass and the edge of the fire to further control it. Since they couldn’t move downwind, the flames just backed slowly into the wind, creating an ever-widening zone of black ash. Because all the grass within those black zones burned, the zones created effective barriers to the head fire, which was ignited later and extinguished itself when it ran into the black.

Here, Amanda is coming through on a UTV and spraying water on any little bits of fire that might try to burn through the wet mowed grass of the fire break.
Cody is widening the black zone with more backing fire.

Once there was a solid line of black along the entire edge of the burn unit, crews started lighting into the wind, still following the edges of the mowed fire breaks. A flanking fire has a little more energy to it than a backing fire because the wind can push it a little more, but because the flames aren’t being pushed directly into the break, they are even easier to control than they are on a backing fire.

Amanda puts down a ‘wet line’ ahead of Mallory, who lights a flanking fire behind her. A UTV follows further behind to make sure all the flames stay inside the breaks.

Once both the backing fire and flanking fires were lit and nice wide black zones were created, the crews finally lit the upwind edges of the fire and let the wind push the flaming front (head fire) through the unit until it hit the black zones and put itself out. The speed of that head fire is much slower on a summer fire than on a spring fire, but the fire still moved steadily.

The head fire is what consumes the majority of the prairie inside the burn unit. It’s also the hottest and most showy part of the fire.

Most photos you see of prescribed fires come from the head fire. That’s because the flames are most spectacular at that stage, but also because crew members have time to pull out their cameras to photograph the fire. The hard work to create the black zones downwind is all done, so all that’s left is to watch the head fire as it makes its way to the black and dies from a lack of fuel. Head fires during a summer burn tend to be less spectacular than those seen during the dormant season when all the vegetation is dry, but we still saw some pretty intense flames last week.

The head fire burns through dense prairie grass and some annual sunflowers.
Flowering big bluestem was surrounded by smoke right before it was consumed by flame.
Flames make their way through stiff sunflower, goldenrod, and other prairie plants.
We made impressive smoke plumes during the head fire phase of each burn. On the other side of that smoke are the wide black zones where the fire burned itself out.
The fire burned the majority of the prairie, but scattered patches of plants remained after the head fire passed. That created some welcome patchiness within the unit and also provided some potential refuges for small animals both during and after the fire (in addition to the refuges created by the majority of the same prairie that wasn’t burned).

Importantly, there are some obvious negative impacts that can come from summer fires. You may have read the post I wrote a couple weeks ago about the tradeoffs involved in the use of any prescribed fire. Because you can go back and revisit that post, I’ll avoid repeating everything I said back then. However, it’s worth re-stating that summer fires – as with any other prescribed burns – need to be planned thoughtfully to avoid wiping out entire populations of potentially vulnerable species of plants or animals. Leaving lots of unburned refuges around the burned area – and, ideally, within it too – is critically important. A summer burn should always cover a relatively small proportion of the total prairie habitat within a management unit unless there are clear and well-considered objectives that outweigh the ecological risk of larger fires.

Crew safety is also an important factor when burning in the summer. When air temperatures are hot and the fire is even hotter than that, crew members can easily get overheated. Heat exhaustion and dehydration are constant threats that need to be monitored and mitigated for. That’s another good reason to stick to smaller burns that don’t take all day. In addition to the heat, smoke from summer fires is also intense, so making sure nobody spends long periods of time in that smoke is really important.

An eastern redcedar begins to burn as the flames run past it. That tree is probably good and dead now.
These dogwoods were almost surely top-killed by the fire. Will they bounce right back next year? Probably. We’ll see. Either way, we’ll enjoy the habitat and plant diversity impacts.

That said, burning in the summer is a way to extend the window for getting prescribed fire done throughout the year, which can be really helpful when fire is a major tool for managing prairies. Our spring fire seasons are often windy and wet (except when they’re windy and dry), and we rarely feel like we get enough burning done. Burning in the summer and fall can help make up for that – recognizing, obviously, that those burns will also have some different impacts than spring fires.

Most importantly, we need to keep learning about the effects of summer fires on woody encroachment, plant composition, and habitat diversity. There are too many challenges in prairie conservation for us to rely only on a few old strategies. We’ll be watching the results of last week’s burns closely and learning from whatever we see. Then we’ll adjust as needed and keep moving forward. Just like always.