I’m Always Glad I Went Out

I don’t ever plan to write an autobiography, but if I do, the title might very well be, “I Was Always Glad I Went Out”. And, of course, it will sell badly because that’s not a very catchy title for a book. Plus, no one wants to hear about my childhood.

Although it’s a terrible book title, it really is something I feel whenever I kick myself out out of the house and into the prairie. Yesterday was a great example. I had the day off because of the federal holiday (The Nature Conservancy gives us federal holidays off, even though we are not a government agency). I woke up and wasn’t sure what to do with myself. Eventually, I decided I really just needed to go somewhere and things would fall into place. That was a smart call.

The part of the prairie grazed throughout 2025 is on the left and the part grazed throughout 2024 (and rested in 2025) is on the right.

I headed out to our family prairie. I wanted to scout some possibilities for a potential future project, but that was really just the excuse I used to talk myself into the trip. When I arrived, I explored happily, mostly in the part of the prairie that had been grazed all of last year and where the vegetation was extremely short. It was a warm enough morning (mid-50s Fahrenheit) that I hoped to find a few insects moving around, even in mid February, and I haven’t had a lot of opportunities for bug photography lately!

The grass was REALLY short from last year’s grazing.
Black medic (the green in the foreground) was one of a number of plants that were already greening up.

You might remember a recent post with a lot of photos I took in part of our prairie during its first year of rest after a year of intensive grazing. The area I was in yesterday will go through a similar process during the coming year, but right now, it’s just really short with a lot of exposed bare ground. I figured the exposed bare ground would make finding insects easy – both because they like soaking in the sunlight and because there’s not much to hide them from my eyes (other than their incredible camouflage and tiny size, of course).

As it happened, I did find a fair number of insects, but I also found plenty of other sights and sounds to catch my attention. The sounds were mostly flocks of migratory snow geese that crisscrossed the sky above me, shouting to each other about something or other. A group of winter meadowlarks flew past as well, but they were just moving from one part of our prairie to another and weren’t nearly as noisy about it.

The first sight that caught my eye was a couple of badger burrows. As I walked, I saw more and more – at least a couple dozen in total. I estimated there were maybe 2 per acre, and that’s likely an underestimate. Coincidentally, I’d just recently received a reply to an email I’d sent to a badger researcher asking about burrows. I’d wanted to confirm that most of the digging activity we see in prairies is from hunting, not necessarily for the purpose of making an overnight sleeping spot. The researcher confirmed my assumption, but also agreed with my guess that the badgers probably did end up sleeping for a night in at least some of those burrows, especially since they’d already gone through the excavation work anyway.

One of many badger burrows in the grazed area.

I’ve noticed before that badgers like to dig around in areas of short vegetation, but I’m not sure I’ve ever seen quite the same burrow density as I saw yesterday. Looking across the road, it looked like there were quite a few in the neighbor’s soybean field, too. (Interestingly, I felt a little betrayed by the badger(s?) when I saw that. Isn’t that ridiculous? I thought, “Hey, why are OUR badgers going to the neighbor’s?? Our little prairie isn’t good enough for them?”)

I’m pretty sure the reason there are so many badger burrows in recently-grazed sites, by the way, is because that’s favored habitat for thirteen-lined ground squirrels, which are often considered badgers’ favorite prey. The ground squirrels like the short habitat and dig their little burrows all over in it. That makes it easy for the badgers, who show up and dig their much bigger burrows in the same spot – digging right down to the ground squirrels and catching/eating them. It’s a terrific strategy, but must be a terrifying way for the ground squirrels to end their lives.

I’m pretty sure this is thirteen-lined ground squirrel activity. And some dried cow manure. This ground squirrel burrow hasn’t yet been dug up by badgers. It’s probably either a lucky ground squirrel or an empty burrow.

Speaking of small mammals, I saw additional evidence that they, and/or other small vertebrates, had been active. In particular, I found a single kernel of corn on the ground, maybe 100 yards from the nearest corn field, and a little cache of soybeans in a different place – again, maybe 100 yards from the closest soybean field. The corn kernel could have been carried there by a number of different animals, I suppose, but I’d guess either a bird or mouse (or maybe a ground squirrel?). The collection of soybeans, though, definitely looked like something only a small mammal would make. I’ve seen similar caches before, but still don’t know which species might be making them. Any small mammal experts out there?

Kernel of corn in the middle of the prairie.
A cache of soybeans collected by some animal who either forgot about them or just hasn’t eaten them yet.

I did find invertebrates, too. They weren’t easy to spot, even with all the bare ground, but I laid down on a few south-facing hill sides where I guessed bugs would get some nice warm sun, and waited until I saw movement. I managed to see and photograph a handful of grasshoppers. Well, not exactly a handful, since they were all very tiny nymphs, but I did see 4-5 of them. They looked different from each other, but I’ve learned enough about grasshoppers to know that differing appearance doesn’t mean they were different species.

Especially among grasshopper nymphs, appearance can sometimes vary quite a bit from individual to individual, and even more between nymphal stages – even within the same species. As a result, the three individuals featured below might very well be all the same species. (The first two photos are different shots of the same individual, which was about 3/4 of an inch long. The second two were two other individuals which were both less than half an inch in length.)

Grasshopper nymph, side view.
The same grasshopper nymph, front view.
A different grasshopper nymph.
Yet another grasshopper nymph.

Many invertebrates (along with some frogs and other vertebrates) have the ability to freeze solid during the cold winter months and then reanimate when it warms back up. I’ve known and marveled at that for a long time, but yesterday, I realized I still had unanswered questions. Primarily, why is that we can put insects in the freezer to kill them (during research data collection efforts, for example) and they don’t reanimate? What’s the difference between that and the kind of freezing they do during very cold winters?

As I often do, I took advantage of having met a lot of smart people during my career, and sent off an email to a few entomologists to ask for an explanation. So far, I’ve only heard back from one of them, so I may have to update this later. The first response, from Mathew Brust, gave me a couple possible explanations. One is that many insects (and other invertebrates) find insulated spots for overwintering – often in leaf litter or in underground burrows. That doesn’t keep them from freezing, but does keep them a lot warmer than if they were just sitting in an exposed spot. The temperature difference between a sheltered and unsheltered spot can be surprisingly stark, and could easily be the difference between life and death. It could very well prevent insects from getting as cold as the the zero degrees F many of our freezers are set at.

A second possibility, though, is that invertebrates can handle cold temperatures much more easily when the temperature change is fairly gradual. If they have time to adjust, their bodies might be able to handle much colder temperatures than if the temperature goes from, say, 80 degrees F to 0 degrees F within a few minutes. That quick and drastic shift might be too much for invertebrates to handle.

Matt also sent me a recent video by Travis McEnery, which explores the ways spiders can survive winter temperatures. You can watch it at this link, if you like. The video does a great job of explaining how the “blood” (hemolymph) of spiders and invertebrates is often formulated in a way that it doesn’t freeze solid until temperatures get far below those that freeze water. There’s a lot more to it, but I’m not going to try to explain it all here.

A really tiny juvenile wolf spider – about 1/4 inch in length.

Another reason (covered by the McEnery video) spiders and insects can handle winter temperatures might tie both Matt’s suggestions together. In at least some invertebrates, their bodies change throughout the year, and in places that have cold winter, invertebrate bodies develop a tolerance to cold (related to the composition of their hemolymph, for example) only when day lengths shorten during the colder times of year. In other words, they’re not adapted to freezing temperatures during our summer research work but they are by the time winter comes around.

Of course, there’s a difference between sheltering in place during cold temperatures and staying active in cold temperatures. Most invertebrates do the former, at least when it’s really cold, but others keep moving around. If you spend a lot of time outdoors in the winter and keep your eyes open for little invertebrates at the same time (and doesn’t everyone?) you may have noticed a surprising amount of activity, even on snow and ice. I often see juvenile wolf spiders, for example (like the one pictured above) on the snow, and have seen them moving around even when temperatures were well below freezing. Springtails (Collembola), aka snow fleas, provide another example of species that seem to do just fine running around when it seems way too cold for that kind of silliness.

Apart from seeing all those animals and conjecturing about their behavior, I also looked at a lot of plants. Some grasses and sedges were starting to green up already, which isn’t unusual, but this warm winter might have them a little ahead of most years. In addition, a number of forbs (broad leaved plants) were also growing. Some were perennials, regrowing from underground buds, and others were brand new plants (probably mostly annuals and biennials).

Cudweed sage, aka white sage (Artemisia ludoviciana).
A new seedling that I couldn’t identify at this early stage.
I’m guessing this is a perennial goldenrod or aster, but I’m not confident.

The most abundant green forb in the heavily grazed site was black medic, which is a non-native legume that always responds well to grazing. We often see flushes in abundance (and/or blooming) of this species in the year following grazing events that create a lot of space and sunlight. Because I’ve conducted annual vegetation surveys throughout the last couple decades, I’ve gotten to see this over and over. Dense vegetation and a lot of thatch (layer of dead vegetation) can kill off the short-lived medic plants beneath it, or, in some cases, it just causes them to shrink down to just a few small leaves. After grazing removes that thatch and reduces the competitive ability of neighboring plants, though, medic can quickly grow and bloom profusely – both from seed and from the little plants just hanging on to life.

There was a lot of black medic, which looked like it had greened up and then frozen again multiple times through the winter.

So, once again, my adage held true. I went out, not sure if there would be anything interesting to see, and I returned with a mind full of observations and questions. Even in mid-February, when prairies are supposed to be dormant (and thus particularly boring), it was a great morning.

I’m always glad when I go out.

Prairie Blizzard Survival

Last week’s blizzard dumped about a foot of snow here in town, and about 18 inches out at our Platte River Prairies.  Combined with wind gusts of 40-50 miles per hour, it was quite a weather event.  Our school was closed for three days while everyone dug themselves out and road crews cleared off streets and country roads.

Knee-deep snow and even deeper drifts buried these sunflowers and many other tall prairie plants. The Nature Conservancy's Platte River Prairies, Nebraska.

Knee-deep snow and even deeper drifts buried these sunflowers and many other tall prairie plants. The Nature Conservancy’s Platte River Prairies, Nebraska.

Blizzards are a part of life out on the prairie.  School closings and sore shoveling muscles are pretty minor inconveniences compared to what grassland creatures without central heat and insulated windows have to deal with.  On the other hand, prairie species have been doing this for thousands of years, so they’ve got it pretty well figured out.  Prairie plants are mostly dormant this time of year, so snow and wind don’t really affect them at all.  Many prairie animals are pretty dormant as well – lots of them spend the winter either below ground (or water) or nestled into deep thatch.  Quite a few mammals, amphibians, insects, and others can slow their metabolisms enough that they can survive the winter without having to search for food or shelter once they’re settled in.

Other animals, however, stay much more active during the winter months, and a blizzard can cause them more problems than it does their more dormant peers.  It’s really hard to gauge how this blizzard might have affected those animals, but during a couple short outings, I’ve tried to see what I can.  It’s not hard to find tracks of deer, coyotes, and various kinds of birds, but that doesn’t say much about what percentage of those animals did or didn’t make it through the storm.  My guess is that most of them did just fine, and the warmer temperatures this week are melting the snow pretty quickly, reducing stress on animals that have a hard time moving through or finding food in deep snow.

Songbird tracks around an indiangrass seed head at Lincoln Creek Prairie in Aurora, Nebraska.

Songbird tracks around an indiangrass seed head at Lincoln Creek Prairie in Aurora, Nebraska.

I walked through some of our Platte River Prairies on Saturday morning, and can empathize with the deer and coyotes whose tracks I saw around me.  I probably only walked a half mile, but even that distance was exhausting.  Warm temperatures on Friday had begun to melt the snow and then that soft top froze overnight.  Every step I took on Saturday morning sounded like, “Crinch, Foomp!” as my boot would very briefly rest on the frozen crust and then pop through as I put more weight on it.  Repeating that process in knee-deep snow for a half a mile was more than enough for me.  It looked like most of the deer I saw were having the same issues.

Based on their track patterns, I bet it would have been funny to watch the coyotes walk through the snow.  I would see a few sets of tracks up on top of the snow, followed by deeper tracks where they’d fallen through the thin crust.  I imagined a poor coyote walking as gingerly as possible on the crust, only to fall to its chest on the next step and have to flounder back up again.  And for what?  There weren’t many tracks of prey species, apart from birds, which probably just laughed at the coyotes as they flew away from them.

Ring-necked pheasant tracks.

Ring-necked pheasant tracks in our Platte River Prairies.

Tracks from a covey of quail (Northern bobwhite) running around on the snow in our Platte River Prairies.

Tracks from a covey of quail (Northern bobwhite) running around on the snow in our Platte River Prairies.

Speaking of birds, I saw some songbird-sized tracks where tree sparrows (I assume) and others were feeding on seeds from prairie plants.  I also saw numerous tracks of pheasants and northern bobwhites (quail).  The quail seemed to have no trouble staying up on the snow’s crust, but the pheasants’ feet were punching through more often, so they probably had much less fun running around.  Regardless, both species must have found abundant shelter on our properties – probably hunkering down within or behind thick clumps of vegetation to escape the driving snow and wind.  Canada geese were noisily flying over the river Saturday morning, so they apparently weathered the storm.  There were a few sandhill cranes in the river valley (early migrants) before the blizzard, but I don’t know if they stuck around or headed back south to escape the weather.

This Eurasian collared-dove

This Eurasian collared-dove died shortly after the blizzard.  Based on the tracks leading to its final resting place, it wasn’t a peaceful passing.

Collard-doves, of course, are not native prairie species, but it's hard to say whether that had anything to do with this one's death. I've seen quite a few others knocking around town over the last few days, so it looks like most of them survived.

Collared-doves, of course, are not native prairie species, but it’s hard to say whether that had anything to do with this one’s death. I’ve seen quite a few others knocking around town over the last few days, so it looks like most of them survived.

It’s rare to find evidence of the animals that didn’t make it through storms like this.  Animals that die in a blizzard either get buried by snow or eaten by others – or both.  I did find one collared-dove here in town that died soon after the storm, but that was the only obvious death.  Because life on the prairie has always been difficult, prairie species have developed strategies to survive just about any event, including droughts, floods, fires, and blizzards (including blizzards much worse than ours last week).  We humans living in prairie country might think we’re pretty tough, but we have it pretty cushy compared to those creatures who actually live in the prairie itself.

Speaking of which, it looks kind of cold and windy out today.  I think maybe I’ll just stay indoors and cook myself a warm meal for lunch…