Back in August, I posted some questions to readers about what they look for when evaluating their own prairies. I got some excellent responses, which I really appreciated. If you missed them, you can re-read that post and those comments here.
As a follow up to that, here is more detail about what I think about as I walk around my family prairie, or one of our Platte River Prairies. Of course, sometimes I just hike around and enjoy the day, but this post is about what I focus on when I’m evaluating our management and considering ideas for next steps. We collect some relatively formal data on some sites, but most of our management decisions are really based on the kind of observation and evaluation I lay out here. I’m certainly not trying to talk you into doing exactly what I’m doing – especially because what I look for is tied to my particular objectives, not yours. Instead, I’m hoping that I might spark some ideas you can incorporate into your own decision making processes.
To start with, the basic objective at both my own prairie and those I help manage professionally is the same. I want to provide a shifting mosaic of habitat structure patches (short, tall, mixed-height, etc.) so that the quilt pattern of those patches looks different each year. I assume that a dynamic management regime like that will support high plant diversity because it doesn’t allow static conditions that allow a few plant species to become dominant. I also assume that those shifting habitat patches will facilitate a healthy community of insects, birds, mammals, reptiles, and other life – above and below ground. These are not blind assumptions; they are based on my own experience and research, along with that of many others. (You can read more about those assumptions here.)
Not surprisingly, the first thing I look for, then, as I walk around a prairie is the pattern of habitat structure. I hope to find the full range of variation, from tall and dense vegetation to almost bare ground. Even more importantly, I want to see some of the important intermediate habitat types – especially short-cropped grass with tall forbs (wildflowers), which is incredibly important for many wildlife and insect species. If I can find all of those habitat types, and they’re in different places than they were last year, I feel pretty good.
Next, I look at the plant community. Plant diversity is an important foundation for invertebrate and wildlife diversity, so I want to see a rich diversity of plants as I walk around. I also want to see that diversity at both large and small scales. Across the whole prairie, I’d hope to find at least 100-200 plant species (though I certainly don’t count them every time) but I should also be able to count at least 10-15 plant species within arms’ reach if I kneel on the ground. These numbers vary, of course, based on geography, soil type, etc., so they may or may not be reasonable at your particular site.
As I look at plant diversity, I want to see habitat patches with an abundance of “opportunistic” plants. These are species that thrive in the absence of competition. Depending upon your point of view, you might also call them “colonizers” or even “weeds”, but when they are abundant, it means that nearby dominant plants have been weakened. We try to periodically knock back the vigor of dominant plants (especially grasses) through fire, grazing or mowing, to help less dominant plants maintain a foothold in the plant community. A flush of opportunistic plants is an indicator of success because it shows that we successfully opened up that space and other plants are taking advantage of it – and not just the weedy ones. Finding seed heads, and even new seedlings, of slower-to-colonize plant species (purple prairie clover, entire-leaf rosinweed, leadplant, etc.) within those weedy patches makes me feel even better.
In sites where cattle are present, I spend time looking at what they’re eating and not eating, as well as which parts of the prairie are being grazed most and least. In our patch-burn grazed prairies, we expect most grazing to take place in recently-burned areas, so I check to see if that’s happening. Often, cattle target their favorite grass species first and then graze wildflowers only if they’ve already eaten the best parts of those grasses. If I see something other than that pattern, it can tell me a lot about our stocking rate or other issues – not necessarily in a bad way. There are also a few plant species that our cattle can’t seem to resist (some milkweeds, rosinweed, Canada milkvetch, and spiderworts) and we like to make sure those species get a release from grazing pressure every few years. As a result, I pay special attention to whether or not – and how intensively – those plants are being grazed. If I notice that they haven’t been allowed to grow and bloom for a few years, it’s time to change up our management and give them a rest.
The other group of plant species I look closely at is invasive species. At our sites, invasive grasses such as smooth brome, Kentucky bluegrass, tall fescue, and others get special attention because of their ability to form monocultures, but there are plenty of others to watch as well. I look not only at the current abundance and density of invasive plants, but also compare what I’m seeing to previous years to see how things are changing. Finally, I pay attention to whether or not there are conditions that appear to be giving invaders an advantage. For example, it would be important to know if cattle are grazing all the plants EXCEPT those invaders, allowing them to encroach upon weakened competition.
Field notes and photos are really helpful when trying to decide whether populations of invasive species are expanding or not. They can also be helpful when comparing grazing impacts, responses from opportunistic plants, and other interesting phenomena. I sometimes flip back to last year’s notes while I’m in the field to see if there’s anything I saw then that I should pay attention to. Then, when I periodically enter my field notes into the computer, I can look at all the notes from other years and look for patterns. I don’t take extensive field notes, but try to write enough to be useful. (See here for more on field notes).
As I continue to learn more about the way various animal and invertebrate species see and utilize prairie habitat, I’ve gotten better at looking our prairies through the eyes of those species. I wrote about wearing “bee goggles” a while ago, but I also try to step back and think about what life would be like in our prairies if I was a grasshopper, mouse, coyote, or other species. Could I find food all year round? Are there places to feed/hunt or hide/escape? If the habitat I’m living in changed dramatically because of fire or grazing, would I be able to find and travel to other habitat nearby? It’s a really interesting exercise, and helps me think about habitat needs in new ways.
Finally, I try to look across the fences and note what is happening on neighboring lands. In some cases, the prairie I’m walking in is the only real prairie habitat in the neighborhood, so it really needs to provide everything for every species living in it. In other cases, there is more grassland habitat nearby, and I can think about how our prairie can help supplement and complement what’s available in those other sites. For example, if all the neighbors graze pretty intensively, I might prioritize tall vegetation structure a little more than if that was the predominant habitat in the neighborhood.
So there you go – a quick look inside my head, for what that’s worth. As I said at the beginning, what you look for should be tied to your objectives, but I also enjoy tagging along when other prairie managers walk their sites because I learn a lot from how they think. I’d love to hear how similar or different my thought processes are from yours.
What kind of coat does a bee wear?
A coat of branched hairs, according to the entomology books, James McGee.
Not a lot of commentary Chris, and I don’t think it’s because people are occupied with holiday stuff. More likely, it is that you have presented a remarkably broad array of things to think about in such a small space, and of such general applicability, so we’re all still mulling it over, and thinking, “Gosh! What is there that’s substantial that I might add to this?”
Another fine example of why this is the best darn prairie blog out there!
This one’s for you Mr. Trager
What kind of coat does a bee wear? A Yellow Jacket :)
Courtesy of my seven year old and yes he knows Yellow Jackets aren’t bees.
It got a smile out of me, James.
I mainly think about how I could get neighboring landowners to think of land less as a commodity whose value derives from how much can be grown or extracted from it or what can be built on it, to a resource that, with the type of conservation-minded grazing and management Chris is showing, could yield sustainable income, increased biodiversity, and a beautiful roaming place. Basically switching the mindset from short term gain versus long term investment.
I also look for the abundance of coyote scat, fresh badger holes, flushed rabbits, vole runs, and mouse holes to get a sense of the predator-prey dynamics. In my case, I see quite a bit of evidence for voles feeding on ground plum and more rabbits lately, which leaves me wondering whether the coyote population has dropped somewhat.
“One critic objected to the presence on the list of woodland milkweed (Asclepias exaulta). ‘This is not a savannah species,’ she said. ‘It is found in oak woodlands 10 to 30 years after grazing.’ But where was it for 10,000 years before cows arrived in the area, I wondered.”
Stephen Packard, Restoration and Management Notes 6.1, pp. 18, 1988
As I look at our natural areas, more and more I think “how did this work before people ever arrived?” I am starting to think spontaneous combustion may have been important in starting fires. I have been trying to figure out what would have gathered together enough organic material to cause spontaneous combustion to occur. Could dung middens have been the source of frequent fire or possibly the nests of large rodents? This mystery continues to leave me searching for answers.
I also am looking for patterns and changes. Why do trees in an area seem so evenly spaced? If changes are occurring in the ecosystem then what has caused these changes to occur? I often worry about the changes I observe and others have recorded. I worry for the ecosystem and whether it will survive in a changing world.
In a newer reconstruction I look for evidence of more conservative species – lead plant, rough blazing star, round headed bushclover, and etc.
In older reconstructions I look for diversity, plant height (when competition starts taking place between plants their height decreases), and invasive species. Also, in older reconstructions plants are patchier-they have found a good spot to colonize and there is a large area of just a couple species. Newer reconstructions do not show that right away, there may be more diversity in a smaller area, because competition has not started to kick out species that do not fit that niche’.
Great collection of thoughts Chris. I like posts like these. Really gets the mind churning, thanks.
Pingback: Indian Creek Ranch » Blog Archive » Resources for Assessing Habitat