The One-Hour Square Meter Photography Challenge!

Do you remember that square meter photography project I did? Twice?

Whew, that was a lot of work. Don’t get me wrong, it was more than worthwhile, but it was definitely a big commitment. I may try it again someday, but not right now.

I continue to enjoy writing and talking about those two year-long projects and I hope to have another product or two come from those initial efforts. In the meantime, I’ve been thinking about some variations on the same theme. I tested one of those last week. I went out to my family prairie and marked out a square meter. Then I spent one hour photographing everything I could find. It was fun!

Here’s the plot.
An aerial view of me at the plot.

What I like about the one-hour version of this project is that it’s very accessible. It’s accessible to me, of course, because I just need to commit 60 minutes of time. More importantly, though, it feels like something that just about anyone else could do, too.

One of the best aspects of this square meter plot story so far is that I’ve heard from a lot of people that they’re trying some version of the project in their backyard, a nearby prairie, or other places. Some people are getting their kids or friends involved, as well. That’s awesome.

However, I think some people are intimidated by the time commitment needed to revisit the same spot over and over. But, hey, everyone can find one hour of time, right?

Let’s see if that’s true. I’m issuing an official challenge – the One-Hour Square Meter Photography Challenge! Can you mark out a square meter and photograph (or draw, or write about) everything you can find in an hour? It doesn’t have to be in a prairie. It can be a potted plant or two on your apartment balcony. It can be a corner of your neighborhood park. Just find a little spot, settle in for an hour, and see what you can find!

What would really make this work is if everyone who does it could then share what they found with others. Post about it on social media! Share you photos (or drawings, or poems, or essays) with friends or at a meeting of your favorite civic organization or social group. Show people how amazing and beautiful nature can be, even at a small scale, and in places where others could find what you found.

Here’s my first attempt. Darker than expected clouds meant the photography light wasn’t great and slowed insect activity a little, but it was still a lot of fun. I will definitely be doing it again. I hope you will, too!

(If the two videos below don’t play, click on the title of this post (top of the page) to open it online.)

A hover fly.
A goldenrod soldier beetle – front facing.
A goldenrod soldier beetle – rear facing.

The big showy plants in the plot were definitely dotted gayfeather and stiff goldenrod. Their flowers were attracting lots of insects – some of which I managed to photograph. Right before I started, I saw a butterfly and a moth, but neither returned after I got my camera out.

Stiff goldenrod (Solidago rigida) and dotted gayfeather (Liatris punctata).
More stiff goldenrod.
Dotted gayfeather.

There were several grass species in the plot, with Indiangrass and sideoats grama being the most visually dominant.

Indiangrass (Sorghastrum nutans).
Sideoats grama (Bouteloua curtipendula).

One of the conundrums I faced was whether to spend time trying to photograph every plant species, including some very small plants, or to stay vigilant to pollinators and other insects coming and going from flowers. I tried some of both, but definitely missed a lot of shots because I was splitting my attention.

A small digger bee on dotted gayfeather.
A common eastern bumblebee.
A drone fly and soldier beetle share the same goldenrod flower head.
A two-striped grasshopper was feeding on goldenrod flowers.
Can you see the tiny insect (a bug) here? It’s right in the middle, but very well camouflaged.

The stiff goldenrod plants had leaf galls on them. Based one some observations and literature reading I did a few years ago (and blog post I wrote), I think the galls were created by a midge (a kind of fly) and a fungus working together.

These circles on stiff goldenrod leaves are galls of an insect that also contain (I think) a fungus.

Here are the plants I found when I spent time looking closely. I ended up photographing 15 plant species, which is a very reasonable number of species per square meter in this part of the world, and I’m sure there were more that I missed because I wasn’t trying to be comprehensive.

Pussytoes – an allelopathic plant (uses chemicals to suppress the growth of nearby plants).
Four more plant species. Clockwise from top left: western ragweed (Ambrosia psilostachya), heath aster (Aster ericoides), wild licorice (Glycyrrhiza lepidota), and whorled milkweed (Asclepias verticillata).
Three grasses and a sedge. Clockwise from top left: Little bluestem (Schizachyrium scoparium), purple lovegrass (Eragrostis pectinacea), sun sedge (Carex heliophila) and Scribner’s panic grass (Panicum oligosanthes).
Two non-native “weedy” plants, neither of which I am concerned about at our prairie. Top: Black medic (Medicago lupulina). Bottom: Sweet clover (Melilotus officinalis)
A tiny lynx spider (spiderling).
Tree cricket.
A treehopper, I think?
Damselfly.

As with my two year-long square meter efforts, the point of this one-hour exercise was not to do a full inventory of species in the plot. That said, I think I photographed 28 different species during the hour. I think that’s very respectable – especially given the dark clouds and the fact that I was experimenting for the first time with this one-hour timeframe. Those 28 species include 15 plants, 12 invertebrates (including the midge in the gall) and a fungus (in the gall). I might find out there were two drone fly species, which would bump the count up by one, but again, that’s not really the point of the project.

This one-hour project was really invigorating! It was easy to set up, easy (though a little frenetic) to do, and now it’s done. I really hope others will give it a try and report back on how it goes!

Celebrating Sticky Seeds

Early autumn is a season of surprise and wonder.  Colors are changing and animals are scurrying all around, trying to check off all their pre-winter tasks.  For nature enthusiasts like us, it’s also a great time to appreciate the complex and sophisticated ways plants move their seeds around the world.

For example, there’s the unexpected prick of joy when you accidentally sandwich a heretofore unseen sandbur between calf and hamstring as you kneel down to re-tie your boot laces. 

(I think that’s the first time I’ve ever used the word “heretofore”.  I hope I used it correctly.  I would have used “previously”, but when I typed it out, the spelling looked wrong for some reason.  Brains are funny.)

Sandbur (Cenchrus longispinus).

Anyway, upon discovering the sandbur, you immediately stand back up, lick your fingers, and remove it (and its friends) from your pantleg.  As you have so many times, you ask yourself why licking your fingers helps it hurt less when you grab sandburs.  Surely, the surface tension of saliva can’t provide that much protection?  Regardless, seeing and feeling the sandburs is a terrific way to celebrate their particular seed dispersal strategy. Hurray for nature!

After you identify a winding path that will allow you to avoid more nearby sandburs, you step forward – only then remembering that you’d stopped to tie your boots.  That’s when you glance down and realize that your boot laces must have pulled loose when you walked through a patch of cockleburs a little way back.  Now, a cheerful cluster of cocklebur seed pods is tangled happily in your laces like spiny little meatballs in a plate of spaghetti. 

Cocklebur (Xanthium strumarium) along a wetland edge.

As you start to carefully extract the pods from your laces, you can’t help but marvel at the similar, but different architecture of cockleburs and sandburs.  Sandburs, of course have long, straight, sharp spines protruding in every direction from their mostly-spherical core.  Those spines have an impressive ability to penetrate nearly any material.

Cockleburs, on the other hand, have what look like dozens of tiny fish hooks sticking out of their football-shaped bodies.  Those hooks can poke through clothing (and boot laces), but they’re more likely to snag than poke, with the little hooks acting like a bunch of tiny grasping claws.  Of course, if they do manage to penetrate clothing or laces, the hooks also make it much harder to extract them.  It’s a really remarkable design.

The strategies of both cockleburs and sandburs are sure effective, you think, as you continue de-tangling your laces.  Also, it’s fun that both of them have “bur” in their names.  That, of course, brings back memories of learning the difference between burs, stickers, thorns, and spines at some point.  You obviously don’t remember what those differences are now – it’s been at least three or four years since you last looked that up and no one can be expected to retain information that long.  It’s fun to know there are differences, though.

Also, it’s weird that the word bur can be spelled with either one “r” or two.  You know that bur oak is definitely spelled with one, though people do insist on adding that second one, don’t they? 

Apart from the name of that tree, which definitely, always has only one “r”, you recall doing a little research a while back and learning that both bur and burr are considered correct spellings in certain situations.  There are burs that are seed pods and burs that are rough edges on metal and it seems to you that people argue whether those two should be spelled the same or differently.  Ah well, someone will probably figure that out and then people won’t have to argue anymore.

Close up, you can see the tiny hooks on the cocklebur spines (thorns? prickles? poky things?).

Anywell, you finish removing the last cocklebur (surely not cockleburr?) from your laces and leave the pods on the ground – having done them the favor of carrying them to a new potential home.  Isn’t it nice to play a helpful role in the dispersal of seeds?  You’re an actual conservation hero.

Well, hero, as you proceed through the prairie (by the way, you’re walking in a prairie), you take a detour around a big patch of tick clover plants.  You’re no fool, after all.  Tick clovers are beautiful, important wildflowers, but their seeds are like little Velcro packets that are good reminders of where the name “tick” clover comes from.  Taking on the role of a seed disperser is all fine and good, but you’re in charge of fixing supper tonight and won’t have time to both do that and scrape a load of tick clover seeds off your long-sleeved shirt.  A wandering deer will surely do the tick clover dispersal without you needing to become involved this time.

Side-stepping the tick clover takes you along the boundary between the prairie and a small adjacent woodland.  As you walk along that edge, a tentacle appears to lash out from beneath the trees and grabs onto your pants.  Startled, you pull away, but the “tentacle” leaves behind a linear string of small sticky pods.  You stumble slightly over a gopher mound, and as you catch your balance again, your leg is caught by two more of those tentacles, which turn out to be branches of the amazing stickseed plant.

Stickseed (Hackelia virginiana) hangs out mostly in woodlands, at least around here.

Stickseed has an even more descriptive name than tick clover.  The sticky “pods” carried by the stickseed branches are, as you oddly recall, actually clusters of four little “nutlets”, each containing little barbed prickles.  I dated a girl named Barb Prickle in high school, I think. 

I’m joking, of course.  Barb wouldn’t have given me the time of day.

Returning to the present, stickseed and its prickly nutlets are magnificent examples of nature’s innovation.  You know from experience that trying to rub the little nutlets off your pants will just cause them to roll along the fabric, never loosening their grip at all.  It really is a spectacular evolutionary achievement.  Well, you’ve owned these pants for almost four months now, so it was probably time to replace them anyway.  It’s a small (well, medium) price to pay for a front row seat to this lovely demonstration of seed dispersal mastery.

A close up of the nutlets with their tiny barbed prickles.
Stickseed seeds (and a little foxtail) on my hiking clothing.

You manage to pull one of the little nutlets loose to inspect it with the hand lens you always carry on a string around your neck.  Under magnification, the little prickles sure don’t look like they’d be as sticky as they obviously are.  As you’re pondering that, you turn to continue your hike and walk straight into a chest-high patch of tick clover. 

Well, look at that, will you?  The pattern of tick clover seed pods across the front of your shirt is really visually attractive. It’s like a free participatory public art project!  (Hm – the seed pods are not really pods.  What are they actually called?  Loments?  Loment segments? No one knows for sure.)  Either way, it’s loments like this that make you really ponder the awesome power of evolution.

This is Illinois tick clover (Desmodium illinoense) but there are lots of species with very similar sticky seeds (or loment segments).

You’ll have to pull those whatever-they’re-called off later, of course, because any that make it to the laundry will still be attached when the shirt comes out of the dryer.  Except, obviously, for a few that will detach and re-attach in fun, surprising places on other pieces of clothing.  That’s ok, picking tick clover seeds off a shirt later tonight will give you something to do while you’re browsing through the internet for new pants.

Speaking of tonight, look at the time!  All this marveling at the wonders of nature has taken the whole afternoon and you’d probably better get on the road so you can get home in time to make supper.  You’ve got leftover pulled pork in the fridge.  That, some fresh carrots, and a bag of chips will make a pretty nice dinner.  Maybe you’ll even stop at the grocery store on the way home and grab a nice jar of barbed prickles to complete the meal.