How to Photograph Flat Prairies

For some reason, there are people who find it difficult to see the aesthetic beauty of places with limited topographic variability. First of all, that sounds like a “them” problem, doesn’t it? Who needs mountains, or even steep hills to feel good about their surroundings? Not me. Not you.

Then, of course, there are others who struggle to find joy in places without trees. I feel bad for people like that, but I also understand that we’re all in different places in our journey. Some of us are just starting out, and feel like trees are the epitome of nature. Some of us have passed far beyond that elementary understanding of the world and don’t have to worry about whether we can see the forest for the trees. We just ignore the forest altogether and spend our time out in the open where we can more interesting things.

I’m kidding, of course. We prairie people don’t ignore trees. We cut them down so they don’t block our view of the prairie.

Regardless, as a service to those who are still working toward a more heightened awareness of the world, I’ve created a simple guide to how to appreciate and photograph flat prairies. I hope you find it useful.

First, one of the best parts about landscapes without steep hills, mountains, or trees is that you can actually see the sky. The first tip, then, is photograph the sky! The sky is amazing. Or, at least, clouds are amazing. The sky itself is fine, but when there are clouds floating around, photograph them! Use the prairie as a foundation for spectacular cloud scenes.

If you’ve taken any classes on photo or drawing composition, you probably learned about leading lines – components of an image that draw the viewer’s eye to a focal point. You don’t need leading lines to make a good prairie photo. On the other hand, if life hands you a mowed trail, you’d be a fool not to use it.

Angling your camera upward toward the sky is a great way to get good photos in the prairie. The opposite, though, is also true. Standing tall and angling your camera downward can sometimes help you highlight the depth and variety of a prairie plant community. It helps to be tall, of course. Since I’m not tall, I use this technique less than some of my friends, mostly because carrying a step ladder around is an inconvenience.

If the sky isn’t providing anything interesting and you’re not tall enough to comfortably look downward into the prairie, another trick is to use plants to break up a monotonous sky. Often, this just entails stooping down a little so some tall wildflowers or grasses are poking up above the horizon. This technique can be a helpful way for people still stuck in the nature-needs-trees-to-be-beautiful world because if you find the right angle, wildflowers and grasses look sort of like trees sticking up into the air. But better.

Early in the season, or in prairies that are not only flat, but also full of short plants, you might have to drop right down to the ground to get photos of plants protruding above the horizon. That’s easy enough.

While you’re down there, you’ll probably see all kinds of fascinating creatures. They also make great photo subjects, so you might end up taking one landscape photo and then filling the remainder of your day with close-up photos of tiny invertebrates and flowers. What could be better than that?

One quick note: It’s perfectly fine to turn your camera vertically. It has a sealed case, which prevents photographic fluid from draining out if you tilt it.

If a sky is missing clouds, you may be able to use the sun instead. Importantly, of course, don’t look at the sun. But if you can manage it safely, the sun – especially very early in the morning or right before sunset – can provide a nice feature of interest for prairie photos.

Now that we’ve covered several techniques, try mixing some of them together! For example, you can both drop low to the ground so plants break up the horizon and also use the sun as a point of interest. Wow! So many options! Again, please don’t look at the sun.

If you find yourself camping in a prairie and are lucky enough to find a campsite that doesn’t have trees that block the view, you can always play with the ol’ glowing tent trick. Actually, this can work even if there are trees around, but it’s a lot better when you can see the sky behind the tent.

If you’ve never tried the ol’ glowing tent trick, it’s very easy. You set your camera on a tripod and use a long exposure – maybe 20-30 seconds. You’ll probably need that much time to capture what little light in the sky there is (lingering sunset glow, moonrise, stars, etc.). However, you’ll also need that time to click the shutter button (a remote trigger is helpful here) and then dash to the tent, unzip the door, slip in, rezip the door, and quickly shine a flashlight around the interior of the tent before the camera shutter closes. It often takes several attempts to get both the light and timing right, so it’s a terrific way to get a little exercise before bedtime.

A final tip, and maybe my favorite, is to use a bumblebee as your foreground. “Chris,” you might be wondering, “won’t the bumblebee just fly away if I get close to it?” Yes, almost always. But sometimes it won’t and it can help make a really great prairie photograph on flat terrain with no trees whatsoever.

I hope you’ve found this guide helpful. If you have friends who still struggle to find beauty and wonder in flat places without mountains or trees, send this to them. We can’t save everyone, but we can at least give them a fighting chance.

The One-Hour Square Meter Photography Challenge!

Do you remember that square meter photography project I did? Twice?

Whew, that was a lot of work. Don’t get me wrong, it was more than worthwhile, but it was definitely a big commitment. I may try it again someday, but not right now.

I continue to enjoy writing and talking about those two year-long projects and I hope to have another product or two come from those initial efforts. In the meantime, I’ve been thinking about some variations on the same theme. I tested one of those last week. I went out to my family prairie and marked out a square meter. Then I spent one hour photographing everything I could find. It was fun!

Here’s the plot.
An aerial view of me at the plot.

What I like about the one-hour version of this project is that it’s very accessible. It’s accessible to me, of course, because I just need to commit 60 minutes of time. More importantly, though, it feels like something that just about anyone else could do, too.

One of the best aspects of this square meter plot story so far is that I’ve heard from a lot of people that they’re trying some version of the project in their backyard, a nearby prairie, or other places. Some people are getting their kids or friends involved, as well. That’s awesome.

However, I think some people are intimidated by the time commitment needed to revisit the same spot over and over. But, hey, everyone can find one hour of time, right?

Let’s see if that’s true. I’m issuing an official challenge – the One-Hour Square Meter Photography Challenge! Can you mark out a square meter and photograph (or draw, or write about) everything you can find in an hour? It doesn’t have to be in a prairie. It can be a potted plant or two on your apartment balcony. It can be a corner of your neighborhood park. Just find a little spot, settle in for an hour, and see what you can find!

What would really make this work is if everyone who does it could then share what they found with others. Post about it on social media! Share you photos (or drawings, or poems, or essays) with friends or at a meeting of your favorite civic organization or social group. Show people how amazing and beautiful nature can be, even at a small scale, and in places where others could find what you found.

Here’s my first attempt. Darker than expected clouds meant the photography light wasn’t great and slowed insect activity a little, but it was still a lot of fun. I will definitely be doing it again. I hope you will, too!

(If the two videos below don’t play, click on the title of this post (top of the page) to open it online.)

A hover fly.
A goldenrod soldier beetle – front facing.
A goldenrod soldier beetle – rear facing.

The big showy plants in the plot were definitely dotted gayfeather and stiff goldenrod. Their flowers were attracting lots of insects – some of which I managed to photograph. Right before I started, I saw a butterfly and a moth, but neither returned after I got my camera out.

Stiff goldenrod (Solidago rigida) and dotted gayfeather (Liatris punctata).
More stiff goldenrod.
Dotted gayfeather.

There were several grass species in the plot, with Indiangrass and sideoats grama being the most visually dominant.

Indiangrass (Sorghastrum nutans).
Sideoats grama (Bouteloua curtipendula).

One of the conundrums I faced was whether to spend time trying to photograph every plant species, including some very small plants, or to stay vigilant to pollinators and other insects coming and going from flowers. I tried some of both, but definitely missed a lot of shots because I was splitting my attention.

A small digger bee on dotted gayfeather.
A common eastern bumblebee.
A drone fly and soldier beetle share the same goldenrod flower head.
A two-striped grasshopper was feeding on goldenrod flowers.
Can you see the tiny insect (a bug) here? It’s right in the middle, but very well camouflaged.

The stiff goldenrod plants had leaf galls on them. Based one some observations and literature reading I did a few years ago (and blog post I wrote), I think the galls were created by a midge (a kind of fly) and a fungus working together.

These circles on stiff goldenrod leaves are galls of an insect that also contain (I think) a fungus.

Here are the plants I found when I spent time looking closely. I ended up photographing 15 plant species, which is a very reasonable number of species per square meter in this part of the world, and I’m sure there were more that I missed because I wasn’t trying to be comprehensive.

Pussytoes – an allelopathic plant (uses chemicals to suppress the growth of nearby plants).
Four more plant species. Clockwise from top left: western ragweed (Ambrosia psilostachya), heath aster (Aster ericoides), wild licorice (Glycyrrhiza lepidota), and whorled milkweed (Asclepias verticillata).
Three grasses and a sedge. Clockwise from top left: Little bluestem (Schizachyrium scoparium), purple lovegrass (Eragrostis pectinacea), sun sedge (Carex heliophila) and Scribner’s panic grass (Panicum oligosanthes).
Two non-native “weedy” plants, neither of which I am concerned about at our prairie. Top: Black medic (Medicago lupulina). Bottom: Sweet clover (Melilotus officinalis)
A tiny lynx spider (spiderling).
Tree cricket.
A treehopper, I think?
Damselfly.

As with my two year-long square meter efforts, the point of this one-hour exercise was not to do a full inventory of species in the plot. That said, I think I photographed 28 different species during the hour. I think that’s very respectable – especially given the dark clouds and the fact that I was experimenting for the first time with this one-hour timeframe. Those 28 species include 15 plants, 12 invertebrates (including the midge in the gall) and a fungus (in the gall). I might find out there were two drone fly species, which would bump the count up by one, but again, that’s not really the point of the project.

This one-hour project was really invigorating! It was easy to set up, easy (though a little frenetic) to do, and now it’s done. I really hope others will give it a try and report back on how it goes!