I’m Always Glad I Went Out

I don’t ever plan to write an autobiography, but if I do, the title might very well be, “I Was Always Glad I Went Out”. And, of course, it will sell badly because that’s not a very catchy title for a book. Plus, no one wants to hear about my childhood.

Although it’s a terrible book title, it really is something I feel whenever I kick myself out out of the house and into the prairie. Yesterday was a great example. I had the day off because of the federal holiday (The Nature Conservancy gives us federal holidays off, even though we are not a government agency). I woke up and wasn’t sure what to do with myself. Eventually, I decided I really just needed to go somewhere and things would fall into place. That was a smart call.

The part of the prairie grazed throughout 2025 is on the left and the part grazed throughout 2024 (and rested in 2025) is on the right.

I headed out to our family prairie. I wanted to scout some possibilities for a potential future project, but that was really just the excuse I used to talk myself into the trip. When I arrived, I explored happily, mostly in the part of the prairie that had been grazed all of last year and where the vegetation was extremely short. It was a warm enough morning (mid-50s Fahrenheit) that I hoped to find a few insects moving around, even in mid February, and I haven’t had a lot of opportunities for bug photography lately!

The grass was REALLY short from last year’s grazing.
Black medic (the green in the foreground) was one of a number of plants that were already greening up.

You might remember a recent post with a lot of photos I took in part of our prairie during its first year of rest after a year of intensive grazing. The area I was in yesterday will go through a similar process during the coming year, but right now, it’s just really short with a lot of exposed bare ground. I figured the exposed bare ground would make finding insects easy – both because they like soaking in the sunlight and because there’s not much to hide them from my eyes (other than their incredible camouflage and tiny size, of course).

As it happened, I did find a fair number of insects, but I also found plenty of other sights and sounds to catch my attention. The sounds were mostly flocks of migratory snow geese that crisscrossed the sky above me, shouting to each other about something or other. A group of winter meadowlarks flew past as well, but they were just moving from one part of our prairie to another and weren’t nearly as noisy about it.

The first sight that caught my eye was a couple of badger burrows. As I walked, I saw more and more – at least a couple dozen in total. I estimated there were maybe 2 per acre, and that’s likely an underestimate. Coincidentally, I’d just recently received a reply to an email I’d sent to a badger researcher asking about burrows. I’d wanted to confirm that most of the digging activity we see in prairies is from hunting, not necessarily for the purpose of making an overnight sleeping spot. The researcher confirmed my assumption, but also agreed with my guess that the badgers probably did end up sleeping for a night in at least some of those burrows, especially since they’d already gone through the excavation work anyway.

One of many badger burrows in the grazed area.

I’ve noticed before that badgers like to dig around in areas of short vegetation, but I’m not sure I’ve ever seen quite the same burrow density as I saw yesterday. Looking across the road, it looked like there were quite a few in the neighbor’s soybean field, too. (Interestingly, I felt a little betrayed by the badger(s?) when I saw that. Isn’t that ridiculous? I thought, “Hey, why are OUR badgers going to the neighbor’s?? Our little prairie isn’t good enough for them?”)

I’m pretty sure the reason there are so many badger burrows in recently-grazed sites, by the way, is because that’s favored habitat for thirteen-lined ground squirrels, which are often considered badgers’ favorite prey. The ground squirrels like the short habitat and dig their little burrows all over in it. That makes it easy for the badgers, who show up and dig their much bigger burrows in the same spot – digging right down to the ground squirrels and catching/eating them. It’s a terrific strategy, but must be a terrifying way for the ground squirrels to end their lives.

I’m pretty sure this is thirteen-lined ground squirrel activity. And some dried cow manure. This ground squirrel burrow hasn’t yet been dug up by badgers. It’s probably either a lucky ground squirrel or an empty burrow.

Speaking of small mammals, I saw additional evidence that they, and/or other small vertebrates, had been active. In particular, I found a single kernel of corn on the ground, maybe 100 yards from the nearest corn field, and a little cache of soybeans in a different place – again, maybe 100 yards from the closest soybean field. The corn kernel could have been carried there by a number of different animals, I suppose, but I’d guess either a bird or mouse (or maybe a ground squirrel?). The collection of soybeans, though, definitely looked like something only a small mammal would make. I’ve seen similar caches before, but still don’t know which species might be making them. Any small mammal experts out there?

Kernel of corn in the middle of the prairie.
A cache of soybeans collected by some animal who either forgot about them or just hasn’t eaten them yet.

I did find invertebrates, too. They weren’t easy to spot, even with all the bare ground, but I laid down on a few south-facing hill sides where I guessed bugs would get some nice warm sun, and waited until I saw movement. I managed to see and photograph a handful of grasshoppers. Well, not exactly a handful, since they were all very tiny nymphs, but I did see 4-5 of them. They looked different from each other, but I’ve learned enough about grasshoppers to know that differing appearance doesn’t mean they were different species.

Especially among grasshopper nymphs, appearance can sometimes vary quite a bit from individual to individual, and even more between nymphal stages – even within the same species. As a result, the three individuals featured below might very well be all the same species. (The first two photos are different shots of the same individual, which was about 3/4 of an inch long. The second two were two other individuals which were both less than half an inch in length.)

Grasshopper nymph, side view.
The same grasshopper nymph, front view.
A different grasshopper nymph.
Yet another grasshopper nymph.

Many invertebrates (along with some frogs and other vertebrates) have the ability to freeze solid during the cold winter months and then reanimate when it warms back up. I’ve known and marveled at that for a long time, but yesterday, I realized I still had unanswered questions. Primarily, why is that we can put insects in the freezer to kill them (during research data collection efforts, for example) and they don’t reanimate? What’s the difference between that and the kind of freezing they do during very cold winters?

As I often do, I took advantage of having met a lot of smart people during my career, and sent off an email to a few entomologists to ask for an explanation. So far, I’ve only heard back from one of them, so I may have to update this later. The first response, from Mathew Brust, gave me a couple possible explanations. One is that many insects (and other invertebrates) find insulated spots for overwintering – often in leaf litter or in underground burrows. That doesn’t keep them from freezing, but does keep them a lot warmer than if they were just sitting in an exposed spot. The temperature difference between a sheltered and unsheltered spot can be surprisingly stark, and could easily be the difference between life and death. It could very well prevent insects from getting as cold as the the zero degrees F many of our freezers are set at.

A second possibility, though, is that invertebrates can handle cold temperatures much more easily when the temperature change is fairly gradual. If they have time to adjust, their bodies might be able to handle much colder temperatures than if the temperature goes from, say, 80 degrees F to 0 degrees F within a few minutes. That quick and drastic shift might be too much for invertebrates to handle.

Matt also sent me a recent video by Travis McEnery, which explores the ways spiders can survive winter temperatures. You can watch it at this link, if you like. The video does a great job of explaining how the “blood” (hemolymph) of spiders and invertebrates is often formulated in a way that it doesn’t freeze solid until temperatures get far below those that freeze water. There’s a lot more to it, but I’m not going to try to explain it all here.

A really tiny juvenile wolf spider – about 1/4 inch in length.

Another reason (covered by the McEnery video) spiders and insects can handle winter temperatures might tie both Matt’s suggestions together. In at least some invertebrates, their bodies change throughout the year, and in places that have cold winter, invertebrate bodies develop a tolerance to cold (related to the composition of their hemolymph, for example) only when day lengths shorten during the colder times of year. In other words, they’re not adapted to freezing temperatures during our summer research work but they are by the time winter comes around.

Of course, there’s a difference between sheltering in place during cold temperatures and staying active in cold temperatures. Most invertebrates do the former, at least when it’s really cold, but others keep moving around. If you spend a lot of time outdoors in the winter and keep your eyes open for little invertebrates at the same time (and doesn’t everyone?) you may have noticed a surprising amount of activity, even on snow and ice. I often see juvenile wolf spiders, for example (like the one pictured above) on the snow, and have seen them moving around even when temperatures were well below freezing. Springtails (Collembola), aka snow fleas, provide another example of species that seem to do just fine running around when it seems way too cold for that kind of silliness.

Apart from seeing all those animals and conjecturing about their behavior, I also looked at a lot of plants. Some grasses and sedges were starting to green up already, which isn’t unusual, but this warm winter might have them a little ahead of most years. In addition, a number of forbs (broad leaved plants) were also growing. Some were perennials, regrowing from underground buds, and others were brand new plants (probably mostly annuals and biennials).

Cudweed sage, aka white sage (Artemisia ludoviciana).
A new seedling that I couldn’t identify at this early stage.
I’m guessing this is a perennial goldenrod or aster, but I’m not confident.

The most abundant green forb in the heavily grazed site was black medic, which is a non-native legume that always responds well to grazing. We often see flushes in abundance (and/or blooming) of this species in the year following grazing events that create a lot of space and sunlight. Because I’ve conducted annual vegetation surveys throughout the last couple decades, I’ve gotten to see this over and over. Dense vegetation and a lot of thatch (layer of dead vegetation) can kill off the short-lived medic plants beneath it, or, in some cases, it just causes them to shrink down to just a few small leaves. After grazing removes that thatch and reduces the competitive ability of neighboring plants, though, medic can quickly grow and bloom profusely – both from seed and from the little plants just hanging on to life.

There was a lot of black medic, which looked like it had greened up and then frozen again multiple times through the winter.

So, once again, my adage held true. I went out, not sure if there would be anything interesting to see, and I returned with a mind full of observations and questions. Even in mid-February, when prairies are supposed to be dormant (and thus particularly boring), it was a great morning.

I’m always glad when I go out.

The Post-Grazing Year

At the beginning of the 2025 growing season, I picked out three sites I could visit repeatedly to photograph/document how a prairie responded to having been grazed the previous year. That turned out to be overly ambitious, but I did manage to focus on one of those sites – an 80×80 foot square marked out at our family prairie – and visited it frequently throughout 2025. I really enjoyed the project and happy to finally share a lot of my favorite photos from it.

One of the reasons I wanted to do this project is that many people have very limited experience with “conservation grazing”, or grazing that is aimed at achieving particular conservation objectives. That’s understandable if your only exposure to cattle grazing comes from seeing overgrazed pastures. As with most things, there’s a lot of variety out there. While it’s not hard to find examples of poorly-grazed grasslands across the Great Plains, there are also countless examples of very thoughtfully-applied grazing that create both good habitat for wildlife/pollinators/plant communities and profitability for ranchers. It’s important to highlight those examples and show that prairies can thrive under well-managed grazing.

Grazing has long been a significant component of prairie ecology. Today, it is still an important part of many prairies, particularly in the Great Plains. Grazing can be used to influence the competition between plants and determine the composition and diversity of the plant community. It can also shape habitat structure, creating areas of short, tall, and patchy vegetation, respectively. A mix of those various habitat types supports a diverse community of animals – large and small.

Here’s the plot on May 1. It was very short from being grazed the entire previous season. The yellower area in the top left is a different part of the same prairie that’s at a different stage of the grazing/rest cycle.

Much of the cattle grazing we’re experimenting with right now, both at The Nature Conservancy/Nebraska and at my family prairie, involves long periods of grazing followed by long periods of rest. There are lots of reasons for this approach, which I won’t go into here, but the biggest objective is to create a broad range of habitat structure across a prairie, without compromising the diversity and richness of the plant community. It’s about creating habitat heterogeneity and ecological resilience.

We’ve been managing our family prairie over the last 10-15 years with open-gate rotational grazing, which has a lot of similarities to patch-burn grazing but isn’t driven by fire. The 80×80 foot plot I photographed in 2025 had been grazed hard most of the previous season (June through October 2024) and part of the season before that (July through Mid-August 2023). By October 2024, it was uniformly short, with a fair amount of bare ground exposed (see the first photo of this post, which shows the plot at the beginning of the 2025 season).

This kind of grazing may sound (and look) irresponsible to people who are either uncomfortable with cattle grazing overall or who have been taught that you should never graze more than half of the biomass of a pasture before moving cattle out. An important point, though, is that the same pasture was rested for two full years prior to 2023/2024 and will be rested for two more full years before it is grazed again. That’s a lot of time for grazed plants to regain their energy and vigor. We’re also looking at how soils respond to this grazing pattern and are seeing positive results (more on that when the data is fully analyzed).

A big patch of purple prairie clover on June 27. Note how short the surrounding grasses are – they’re low on energy because of the previous year’s grazing. They’ll have recovered that energy by next year.
Stiff goldenrod was abundant and in full color on September 13. Again, note the sparsity and short height of the grasses and the space between plants.

My favorite part of grazing approaches like open-gate rotation and patch-burn grazing is the way the prairie community responds in the first year after a long season of grazing. The vigor of the typically-dominant plants (tall grasses, in particular) has been temporarily suppressed, releasing many other plants from that competitive pressure. This usually results in a big wildflower party, including both long-lived perennials and a lot of short-lived plants who are taking advantage of a short window of opportunity to germinate, bloom, and die while the big grasses aren’t able to prevent them from doing so.

The resulting habitat structure is terrific for many animal species, large and small. The reduced height and density of grasses means that it’s easy for animals to move through the vegetation. At the same time, other plants grow tall, creating a kind of miniature savanna, where tall wildflowers are like trees, surrounded by shorter vegetation. Animals can move from sun to shade easily to regulate their temperature. They can also can feed in open areas but quickly retreat to cover when they want to. This supports a huge abundance of invertebrates. It also draws in many larger animals, attracted both by the habitat structure and the food source (invertebrates).

In this October 7 photo, the foreground is the area featured in this post at the end of the 2025 growing season and the short-cropped area in the background is what was grazed hard in 2025 and will be rested in 2026 and 2027.

One highlight of the year was that I found purple coneflower in my plot (two different plants). I’ve only seen the species a few times during the 30 years or so I’ve been involved in the management of our family prairie and it had been a while since my last sighting. I wish I could tell you whether it was there because of some overseeding I did a few years ago or because it had been there a long time without me noticing it. Either way, it was really nice to find it.

Purple coneflower (Echinacea angustifolia)

Access to bare ground is crucial for many animals, including a lot of ground nesting bee species, bandwing grasshoppers, various invertebrate predators, and lots of others. Some of those need areas nearly free of any vegetation, but many just need places where the soil isn’t covered by a thick layer of thatch. Last year’s grazing removed most of the plant material from this part of the pasture and also tempered the growth of dominant grasses. The result was that there was lots of great habitat for species that need both bare soil and abundant sunlight.

The bare ground created by last year’s grazing made important habitat for lots of creatures, including this tiger beetle larva hunting at the top of its burrow.
This narrow stink bug was well-camouflaged on its favorite food plant – sideoats grama.
This fly was killed by a fungus that made it crawl to the top of this fleabane plant before dying. Read more about that here.
This bush katydid thought it was hiding from me by sitting still.

The following slideshows provide a visual journey through the 2024 season, from May through October. There are also two additional slideshows at the end, featuring lady beetles and crab spiders. If you’re reading this in an email, these slideshows will display as grids of images. If you click on the title of the post at the top of the email, you’ll be able to view this post online and will be able to scroll through the slideshow and see larger versions of the photos.

May Slideshow

June Slideshow

July/August Slideshow

September/October Slideshow

Finally, here are two last (short) slideshows featuring lady beetles and crab spiders. Why did I choose to highlight these two groups separately? That’s a great question. We all make decisions, don’t we?

Lady Beetles

Crab Spider Slideshow

For any of you who made it this far, I hope you enjoyed the results of this project. For me, it was a like a more relaxed version of my square meter project, in that I visited the same spot over and over through the season. An 80×80 foot plot seemed like a whole universe compared to that square meter, though.

Hopefully, the photos helped you visualize the ways in which a prairie can respond to cattle grazing. This single example, of course, shouldn’t be used to predict how other prairies might respond to similar management, though it was pretty typical of what I’ve seen on numerous sites in central Nebraska.

The most important message is that prairies have a lot of resilience built into them and it’s fascinating to watch that resilience on display. There are lots of good/right ways to manage prairies, depending upon your objectives, and we surely haven’t explored all of those yet. It’s ok to experiment with new approaches to see what happens. How else will we learn?