Last week, I posted some drone photos of the Niobrara Valley Preserve from the air. The sun popped out of the clouds just as it was nearing the horizon and provided some great light for those images. As I was packing the drone away, I kept an eye on the sky, and it looked like there might be some nice post-sunset color on the way, so I scrambled up the hill to my favorite sunset spot at the Preserve. For the most part, I get pretty easily bored by sunset photos, so it takes a pretty spectacular night to get my camera out of the bag. That night qualified as spectacular.
Over about a 15 minute period, I worked back and forth across the top of a ridge overlooking the Niobrara River, trying various angles and perspectives. The color and texture of the clouds was fantastic, but I knew the color would fade quickly. After I got back and sorted through the images, I had a hard time narrowing down my favorites. Nearly two weeks later, I still couldn’t decide on just one (or even two) shots to share with you. Instead, I chose a selection of four images from various angles and with different lenses. If you have a strong favorite, feel free to leave your opinion in the comments section. At this point, I like all of them for different reasons. I also like about 10 more, but I had to cut something…
I’m presenting these photos in the order they were taken. If you look closely, you’ll notice that the color tone changed incrementally over the 15 minute period. You might also notice that each successive photo was taken with a longer focal length. Part of that was me playing with different ideas, but the color was also receding into a smaller and smaller portion of the sky, so I was matching that with focal length changes.
It’s pretty hard not to take attractive photos at a place like the Niobrara Valley Preserve, especially when the sky does its part to add to the scenery. One of the hardest parts of working up there is keeping my camera in its bag long enough to get some other work done!
Many of you remember previous posts about the wildfire that swept across the Niobrara Valley back in July 2012. About half of The Nature Conservancy’s Niobrara Valley Preserve burned during that event. Through some funding from the Nebraska Environmental Trust Fund and assistance from Moonshell Media, we set up an array of timelapse cameras to document the recovery of our site from that fire.
I’ve spent much of this week looking through many thousands of images from those cameras. The cameras (when they are working properly) take one photo each daylight hour. Between April 2013 and today, that is approximately 14 billion images – or so it seems through my weary and bloodshot eyes. As I’ve been poring through these photos, looking for stories they can tell us, one thing that keeps my fire stoked (so to speak) is the periodic discovery of dramatic light and/or scenes captured by the automated cameras. Today, I’m sharing a selection of those accidental masterpieces taken by one particular camera that was set up to peer downstream from near the top of the bluff north of the Niobrara River.
When we set up this camera, my hope was to watch the re-greening of the hills beneath the dead ponderosa pine and eastern red cedar trees and maybe catch a nice sunrise or two. Both objectives were achieved, along with some other really gorgeous photographs – some of which happened only because the camera malfunctioned.
So, there you go. A beautiful series of images that also show what happens following a wildfire. Ecological processes don’t stop after a fire, they just shift into a different gear. We have done nothing to aid or enhance the recovery of the woodland at this site. To this point, we’ve just been watching for signs of trouble – invasive plants that might take advantage of the situation, serious soil erosion issues, etc. There hasn’t yet been any reason to step in and act. Plants and animals are thriving on the slopes shown in these photos, though the composition of those communities has changed pretty dramatically – and continues to change.
Ecological resilience is about the ability of natural systems to absorb shock and keep functioning. The pine woodland is gone from these hills, and it will probably take many decades to show up again because they are pretty far away from unburned pine woodland that could provide seed. In the meantime, we will do our job as land stewards and try to facilitate the most biological diversity we can, using the primary tools available to us – prescribed fire and grazing to manipulate plant competition and habitat structure, and spot-treatment (as needed) with herbicides to control invasives.
We hope to keep these timelapse cameras going for at least several more years. Hopefully, that will help us continue documenting the amazing resilience of nature, and the specific stories playing out at the Niobrara Valley Preserve. If nothing else, we should be at least get some more beautiful, if accidental, photographs to enjoy.
I drove up to the Niobrara Valley Preserve this week and arrived in time for a long hike before dark on Monday evening. It was the kind of opportunity to wander and think that is critically important (but unfortunately rare) for land managers and ecologists. I focused my time north of the river where steep ridges and “foothills” full of pines, bur oaks, prairie, and lots of eastern red cedar trees had experienced an intense summer wildfire during the severe drought of 2012. Since the fire, our staff has been having lots of discussions about how we should be managing the site and its recovery. It was great to have a few hours to just hike around, observe, and think. I took some notes in my field notebook as I walked. Here are a few of those notes (in italics), fleshed out with some of the further thoughts.
No young cedar or pine trees anywhere.
As we started to assess the impacts of the wildfire, many of my biggest questions had to do with the future of this area north the river, where ponderosa pine and bur oak trees had been abundant, along with an extensive population of eastern red cedar. I knew the Sandhills prairie would recover just fine (and it has), and I figured we wouldn’t see much pine re-establishment for a long time (none so far), but I was most concerned that cedars would re-infest the slopes north of the river faster than we could control them. Because the pines and cedars had been so thick in many areas, I guessed it would be a while before grass colonized sufficiently to support a prescribed burn hot enough to kill cedar trees, and I worried that we’d end up right where we’d been within 10-15 years (except with all cedars and no pines). As it happens, the grass is filling in pretty well in many places, but I haven’t seen a single young cedar tree yet. Researchers from the University of Nebraska-Lincoln, who are helping us study the area, have apparently seen a couple, but they are exceedingly rare. (One of those researchers, graduate student Amanda Hefner, is working to answer many of the questions we have about the recovery of these wooded areas.)
I’ve been talking to other people about their experiences with hot prescribed fires or summer wildfires that wiped out cedar trees in Nebraska grasslands. Typically, without follow-up fire, a dense regrowth of cedars reaches head high or so within about 10 years. Based on what I’m seeing so far, I don’t think we’re going to see that kind of rapid reestablishment. So, why? Did the fire scorch the seed bank? Is the area far enough away from other fruiting cedar trees that it is temporarily safe from reinvasion? I really need to spend some time walking near the edge of the big wildfire to see what the cedar re-invasion looks like there.
The wildfire didn’t appear to affect sumac, plum, or other deciduous shrubs – even in hottest areas.
A big topic in the prescribed fire circles here in Nebraska has been the proposal that we should consider conducting burns in hotter and drier conditions than we usually do. University of Nebraska Range Ecologist, Dirac Twidwell, has been leading this push. Research that Twidwell and others conducted in the southern Plains showed some dramatic positive results from summer burning under severe drought conditions – including mortality of some re-sprouting tree species that hadn’t previously been thought to be susceptible to fire. I’ve been wondering about using hotter summer fires, perhaps during drought conditions, as a way to combat high populations of deciduous trees and shrubs in prairies. Maybe burning under more stressful conditions (for the trees) would reduce their populations? I’m still thinking about that idea, but what I saw at the Niobrara Valley Preserve makes me question how likely we are to see success. Even in areas where cedars and pines experienced crown fires, and fire intensity was at its highest during the July 2012 wildfire (in hot weather, during a severe drought), I don’t see any evidence that sumac or wild plum were hurt at all. I can see the outline of the shrub patches that burned during the fire, and today’s patches are even bigger – and maybe more dense – than they were before the wildfire.
Most bur oaks in steep draws were single trunks before the 2012 wildfire, but out in the open, many were multi-trunk trees. They must have seen at least one big fire in the past?
People who spend more time than I do along the Niobrara may find this to be old news, but I was surprised at how many old bur oaks had multiple trunks prior to the 2012 wildfire – evidence that they’d likely been through a relatively severe fire that had caused them to respond by resprouting from their bases. We should cut a few of those old trunks apart to date that fire. Interestingly, however, those multi-trunk trees seemed to be mainly (exclusively?) outside of the steep draws. Those draws were full of pines and cedars, along with oaks and a few other deciduous trees, and there wasn’t much herbaceous vegetation (grasses, sedges, and forbs) beneath those trees. The combination of steep terrain, lack of herbaceous fuel for fires, and high soil moisture (shade from trees and steep terrain), probably kept previous fires from being intense enough in those areas to top-kill oak trees. However, the 2012 wildfire was a completely different animal, and now nearly all the bur oaks north of the river are starting their growth over from the base. It will be very interesting to see if they all turn into big trees with 4-5 trunks again.
The steepest slopes at the top of ridge are still dominated by annuals. Perennial grasses are filling in well elsewhere, except steep slopes under (formerly) dense cedars and pines.
In general, I’ve been pleasantly surprised by the density of herbaceous vegetation in much of the 2012 wildfire area north of the river. Even where pine and cedar density was fairly high, perennial grasses and sedges are filling in pretty quickly. The thinnest vegetation is in places where topography is particularly steep and where big pines and cedars had been growing most thickly. Where trees were thin or non-existent before the fire, the vegetation responded just as I’d expect prairie to do – there is great plant vigor and species diversity. Where the vegetation had been thinner prior to the fire because shade from trees, today’s plant diversity seems lower, and many patches are dominated by one or two grass species. Species such as sand lovegrass (Eragrostis trichodes) and Scribner’s panicum (Panicum oligosanthes), for example, have formed near monocultures in many places. I think these will diversify over time, so I think it’s great (and interesting) to see them for now.
However, in those steeper areas, especially near the top of the ridge, perennial grasses and sedges are still very thin, and most vegetation is annuals. This isn’t necessarily a problem, and the annuals seem to do a pretty good job of holding the soil, but it makes me wonder about the speed and eventual trajectory of the plant community recovery in these areas. Mostly, I’m just curious to see what happens, but I’m also a little concerned that we might see some invasive species fill in before native perennials get a foothold. As an example, smooth brome is common in the flats above the ridge, and it’d be a shame if it also gained dominance on the steep slopes below. I’m hopeful that the soil conditions won’t favor brome, but we’ll have to just wait and see.
> > > > > > >
Overall, these observations just add further complexity to discussions our staff has been having about how to manage this area in the future. We still need to decide what we want the area to become so we can guide it in that direction. It’s all fine and good to say we’ll just let it develop however it wants to, but if the site trends toward a cedar woodland with a smooth brome understory, for example, that’s not really going to be very positive for wildlife or biological diversity.
We’d really like to encourage the bur oak trees to survive and thrive but aren’t sure what kind of fire frequency or intensity might best facilitate that. What about deciduous shrubs? Are we ok with letting the current clones become so large and dense that they eliminate grasses beneath them? They would essentially be fireproof at that point, and we’d have no easy way of thinning or otherwise managing them – especially in really steep areas. More importantly, those shrub patches would likely provide safe haven for cedars and other trees to establish and grow within those fireproof shrub clones. Is that what we want? If not, what are our management options? We have lots of ideas, but still have a lot of discussing, researching, and observing to do.
These kinds of questions and challenges are why land management is interesting and fun. I’m really looking forward to watching this area (and all the others I get to help with) continue to develop over the next few decades.
When I was at the Niobrara Valley Preserve a couple weeks ago, I spent some time exploring the area north of the river where the 2012 wildfire ripped through oak savanna and ponderosa pine woodland. As discussed in earlier posts, the density of trees, especially eastern redcedar, fueled a fire that killed nearly every pine and cedar in the 3000 acres of Preserve land on the north side of the river. Most oaks and other decidous trees were topkilled, but many resprouted within a few weeks of the fire. I have been following the regrowth and recovery of this part of the Preserve with great interest, and trying to help the Preserve staff as they think about how to manage the area in the future.
Here is a series of photos from an uphill hike I took on September 18. The photos are roughly in order of elevation, starting at the river road (just above the floodplain) and proceeding upslope to the ridgetop at the north edge of the valley.
I came down the slope after my walk with a great feeling of optimism. My greatest worries about this area of the preserve had been that
1) Invasive plants would fill the slopes before the native vegetation could recover, and we’d be faced with the difficult challenge of attacking those invasives in difficult terrain.
2) Numerous eastern redcedar trees would colonize the slopes before there was enough vegetation to carry prescribed fires to knock those cedars back.
3) Soil erosion would be so severe that the seed bank needed to reestablish the native plant community would wash down the slope, along with the topsoil those plants needed to grow.
None of those three have occurred – or at least to the extent I feared they might. There has been some erosion, but much less than I anticipated, and it doesn’t seem to be affecting vegetation recovery much. I haven’t seen any truly invasive plants yet – which doesn’t mean they aren’t there, but they sure aren’t roaring in. Finally, the recovery of the vegetation has been fast enough that we should be able to start running prescribed fires up the slopes within the next few years. I didn’t see any little cedar trees on my walk, and while I’m sure there are a few around, the abundance is much less than I feared, and our ability to use prescribed fire should make it fairly easy to control them, except on the steepest slopes.
Most of all, the beauty of the Niobrara Valley has survived the wildfire. The pines are gone from some parts of the valley, but are still doing well in other areas nearby, including other parts of the Niobrara Valley Preserve. Whether or not (or when) they’ll return to the site of the 2012 fire is still an open question. Regardless, there is abundant life on the slopes north of the river. Just because those slopes will be dominated by different species than before doesn’t change the scenic or ecological value of the site. It’s still one of my favorite places on earth.